Session Initiation Protocol
The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) is an application-layer control (signaling)
protocol for creating, modifying, and terminating sessions with one or more
participants. It can be used to create two-party, multiparty, or multicast sessions that
include Internet telephone calls, multimedia distribution, and multimedia conferences.
(cit. RFC 3261). SIP is designed to be independent of the underlying transport layer;
it can run on TCP, UDP, or SCTP.
It was originally designed by Henning Schulzrinne (Columbia University) and Mark
Handley (UCL) starting in 1996. The latest version of the specification is RFC 3261
from the IETF SIP Working Group. In November 2000, SIP was accepted as a 3GPP
signaling protocol and permanent element of the IMS architecture. It is widely used as
a signaling protocol for Voice over IP, along with H.323 and others.
SIP has the following characteristics:
Transport-independent, because SIP can be used with UDP, TCP, ATM & so on.
Text-based, allowing for humans to read SIP messages.
Protocol design
SIP clients use TCP or UDP (typically on port 5060) to connect to SIP servers and
other SIP endpoints. SIP is primarily used in setting up and tearing down voice or
video calls. However, it can be used in any application where session initiation is a
requirement. These include Event Subscription and Notification, Terminal mobility
and so on. There are a large number of SIP-related RFCs that define behavior for
such applications. All voice/video communications are done over separate session
protocols, typically RTP.
A motivating goal for SIP was to provide a signalling and call setup protocol
for IP-based communications that can support a superset of the call processing
functions and features present in the public switched telephone network (PSTN).
SIP by itself does not define these features; rather, its focus is call-setup and
signalling. However, it has been designed to enable the building of such features in
network elements known as Proxy Servers and User Agents. These are features that
permit familiar telephone-like operations: dialing a number, causing a phone to ring,
hearing ringback tones or a busy signal. Implementation and terminology are
different in the SIP world but to the end-user, the behavior is similar.
SIP-enabled telephony networks can also implement many of the more advanced call
processing features present in Signalling System 7 (SS7), though the two
protocols themselves are very different. SS7 is a highly centralized protocol,
characterized by a highly complex central network architecture and dumb
endpoints (traditional telephone handsets). SIP is a peer-to-peer protocol. As
such it requires only a very simple (and thus highly scalable) core network with
intelligence distributed to the network edge, embedded in endpoints (terminating
devices built in either hardware or software). SIP features are implemented in
the communicating endpoints (i.e. at the edge of the network) as opposed to
traditional SS7 features, which are implemented in the network.
Although many other VoIP signalling protocols exist, SIP is characterized by its
proponents as having roots in the IP community rather than the telecom industry.
SIP has been standardized and governed primarily by the IETF while the H.323
VoIP protocol has been traditionally more associated with the ITU. However, the
two organizations have endorsed both protocols in some fashion.
SIP works in concert with several other protocols and is only involved in the
signalling portion of a communication session. SIP acts as a carrier for the
Session Description Protocol (SDP), which describes the media content of the
session, e.g. what IP ports to use, the codec being used etc. In typical use,
SIP "sessions" are simply packet streams of the Real-time Transport Protocol
(RTP). RTP is the carrier for the actual voice or video content itself.
The first proposed standard version (SIP 2.0) was defined in RFC 2543. The
protocol was further clarified in RFC 3261, although many implementations are
still using interim draft versions. Note that the version number remains 2.0.
SIP is similar to HTTP and shares some of its design principles: It is human
readable and request-response structured. SIP shares many HTTP status codes,
such as the familiar '404 not found'. SIP proponents also claim it to be simpler than H.
323. However, some would counter that while SIP originally had a goal of simplicity, in
its current state it has become as complex as H.323.
Others would argue that SIP is a stateless protocol, hence making it possible to
easily implement failover and other features that are difficult in stateful protocols
such as H.323. SIP and H.323 are not limited to voice communication but can
mediate any kind of communication session from voice to video or future, unrealized
applications.
SIP network elements
Hardware endpoints — devices with the look, feel, and shape of a traditional
telephone, but that use SIP and RTP for communication — are commercially
available from several vendors. Some of these can use Electronic Numbering (ENUM)
or DUNDi to translate existing phone numbers to SIP addresses, so calls to other SIP
users can bypass the telephone network, even though your service provider might
normally act as a gateway to the PSTN network for traditional phone numbers (and
charge you for it). Today, software SIP endpoints are common.
SIP also requires proxy and registrar network elements to work as a practical
service. Although two SIP endpoints can communicate without any intervening SIP
infrastructure, which is why the protocol is described as peer-to-peer, this approach
is impractical for a public service. There are various implementations that can act as
proxy and registrar.
"SIP makes use of elements called proxy servers to help route requests to the
user's current location, authenticate and authorize users for services, implement
provider call-routing policies, and provide features to users." "SIP also provides a
registration function that allows users to upload their current locations for use by
proxy servers. " "Since registrations play an important role in SIP, a User Agent
Server that handles a REGISTER is given the special name registrar." "It is an
important concept that the distinction between types of SIP servers is logical, not
physical."
Instant messaging (IM) and presence
A standard instant messaging protocol based on SIP, called SIMPLE, has been
proposed and is under development. SIMPLE can also carry presence information,
conveying a person's willingness and ability to engage in communications. Presence
information is most recognizable today as buddy status in IM clients.
Some efforts have been made to integrate SIP-based VoIP with the XMPP
specification used by Jabber. Most notably Google Talk, which extends XMPP to
support voice, plans to integrate SIP. Google's XMPP extension is called Jingle
and, like SIP, it acts as a Session Description Protocol carrier.
SIP itself defines a method of passing instant messages between endpoints, similar
to SMS messages. This is not generally supported by commercial operators.
Commercial applications
Firewalls typically block media packet types such as UDP, though one way around
this is to use TCP tunnelling and relays for media in order to provide NAT and firewall
traversal. One solution involves tunnelling the media packets within TCP or HTTP
packets to a relay. This solution uses additional functionality in conjunction with SIP,
and packages the media packets into a TCP stream which is then sent to the relay.
The relay then extracts the packets and sends them on to the other endpoint. If the
other endpoint is behind a symmetrical NAT, or corporate firewall that does not allow
VOIP traffic, the relay would transfer the packets to another tunnel. One
disadvantage of this approach is that TCP was not designed for real time traffic such
as voice, so an optimized form of the protocol is sometimes used.
As envisioned by its originators, SIP's peer-to-peer nature does not enable
network-provided services. For example, the network can not easily support legal
interception of calls (referred to in the United States by the law governing
wiretaps, CALEA). Emergency calls (calls to E911 in the USA) are difficult to
route. It is difficult to identify the proper Public Service Answering Point, PSAP
because of the inherent mobility of IP end points and the lack of any network location
capability. However, as commercial SIP services begin to take off practical solutions
to these problems are being proven. Standards being developed by such
organizations as 3GPP and 3GPP2 define applications of the basic SIP model which
facilitate commercialization and enable support for network-centric capabilities such
as CALEA.
Many VoIP phone companies allow customers to bring their own SIP devices, as
SIP-capable telephone sets, or softphones. The new market for consumer SIP
devices continues to expand.
The free software community started to provide more and more of the SIP
technology required to build both end points as well as proxy and registrar
servers leading to a commoditization of the technology, which accelerates global
adoption. SIP foundry has made available and actively develops a variety of SIP
stacks, client applications and SDKs, in addition to entire IP PBX solutions
that compete in the market against mostly proprietary IP PBX implementations
from established vendors.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Advanced Networking
Technologies Division provides a public domain implementation of the JAVA
Standard for SIP JAIN-SIP which serves as a reference implementation for the
standard. The stack can work in proxy server or user agent scenarios and has
been used in numerous commercial and research projects. It supports RFC 3261 in
full and a number of extension RFCs including RFC 3265 (Subscribe / Notify) and
RFC 3262 (Provisional Reliable Responses) etc
Attributes and Credits
The information and facts supplied on this subject
derive from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) is an application-layer control (signaling)
protocol for creating, modifying, and terminating sessions with one or more
participants. It can be used to create two-party, multiparty, or multicast sessions that
include Internet telephone calls, multimedia distribution, and multimedia conferences.
(cit. RFC 3261). SIP is designed to be independent of the underlying transport layer;
it can run on TCP, UDP, or SCTP.
It was originally designed by Henning Schulzrinne (Columbia University) and Mark
Handley (UCL) starting in 1996. The latest version of the specification is RFC 3261
from the IETF SIP Working Group. In November 2000, SIP was accepted as a 3GPP
signaling protocol and permanent element of the IMS architecture. It is widely used as
a signaling protocol for Voice over IP, along with H.323 and others.
SIP has the following characteristics:
Transport-independent, because SIP can be used with UDP, TCP, ATM & so on.
Text-based, allowing for humans to read SIP messages.
Protocol design
SIP clients use TCP or UDP (typically on port 5060) to connect to SIP servers and
other SIP endpoints. SIP is primarily used in setting up and tearing down voice or
video calls. However, it can be used in any application where session initiation is a
requirement. These include Event Subscription and Notification, Terminal mobility
and so on. There are a large number of SIP-related RFCs that define behavior for
such applications. All voice/video communications are done over separate session
protocols, typically RTP.
A motivating goal for SIP was to provide a signalling and call setup protocol
for IP-based communications that can support a superset of the call processing
functions and features present in the public switched telephone network (PSTN).
SIP by itself does not define these features; rather, its focus is call-setup and
signalling. However, it has been designed to enable the building of such features in
network elements known as Proxy Servers and User Agents. These are features that
permit familiar telephone-like operations: dialing a number, causing a phone to ring,
hearing ringback tones or a busy signal. Implementation and terminology are
different in the SIP world but to the end-user, the behavior is similar.
SIP-enabled telephony networks can also implement many of the more advanced call
processing features present in Signalling System 7 (SS7), though the two
protocols themselves are very different. SS7 is a highly centralized protocol,
characterized by a highly complex central network architecture and dumb
endpoints (traditional telephone handsets). SIP is a peer-to-peer protocol. As
such it requires only a very simple (and thus highly scalable) core network with
intelligence distributed to the network edge, embedded in endpoints (terminating
devices built in either hardware or software). SIP features are implemented in
the communicating endpoints (i.e. at the edge of the network) as opposed to
traditional SS7 features, which are implemented in the network.
Although many other VoIP signalling protocols exist, SIP is characterized by its
proponents as having roots in the IP community rather than the telecom industry.
SIP has been standardized and governed primarily by the IETF while the H.323
VoIP protocol has been traditionally more associated with the ITU. However, the
two organizations have endorsed both protocols in some fashion.
SIP works in concert with several other protocols and is only involved in the
signalling portion of a communication session. SIP acts as a carrier for the
Session Description Protocol (SDP), which describes the media content of the
session, e.g. what IP ports to use, the codec being used etc. In typical use,
SIP "sessions" are simply packet streams of the Real-time Transport Protocol
(RTP). RTP is the carrier for the actual voice or video content itself.
The first proposed standard version (SIP 2.0) was defined in RFC 2543. The
protocol was further clarified in RFC 3261, although many implementations are
still using interim draft versions. Note that the version number remains 2.0.
SIP is similar to HTTP and shares some of its design principles: It is human
readable and request-response structured. SIP shares many HTTP status codes,
such as the familiar '404 not found'. SIP proponents also claim it to be simpler than H.
323. However, some would counter that while SIP originally had a goal of simplicity, in
its current state it has become as complex as H.323.
Others would argue that SIP is a stateless protocol, hence making it possible to
easily implement failover and other features that are difficult in stateful protocols
such as H.323. SIP and H.323 are not limited to voice communication but can
mediate any kind of communication session from voice to video or future, unrealized
applications.
SIP network elements
Hardware endpoints — devices with the look, feel, and shape of a traditional
telephone, but that use SIP and RTP for communication — are commercially
available from several vendors. Some of these can use Electronic Numbering (ENUM)
or DUNDi to translate existing phone numbers to SIP addresses, so calls to other SIP
users can bypass the telephone network, even though your service provider might
normally act as a gateway to the PSTN network for traditional phone numbers (and
charge you for it). Today, software SIP endpoints are common.
SIP also requires proxy and registrar network elements to work as a practical
service. Although two SIP endpoints can communicate without any intervening SIP
infrastructure, which is why the protocol is described as peer-to-peer, this approach
is impractical for a public service. There are various implementations that can act as
proxy and registrar.
"SIP makes use of elements called proxy servers to help route requests to the
user's current location, authenticate and authorize users for services, implement
provider call-routing policies, and provide features to users." "SIP also provides a
registration function that allows users to upload their current locations for use by
proxy servers. " "Since registrations play an important role in SIP, a User Agent
Server that handles a REGISTER is given the special name registrar." "It is an
important concept that the distinction between types of SIP servers is logical, not
physical."
Instant messaging (IM) and presence
A standard instant messaging protocol based on SIP, called SIMPLE, has been
proposed and is under development. SIMPLE can also carry presence information,
conveying a person's willingness and ability to engage in communications. Presence
information is most recognizable today as buddy status in IM clients.
Some efforts have been made to integrate SIP-based VoIP with the XMPP
specification used by Jabber. Most notably Google Talk, which extends XMPP to
support voice, plans to integrate SIP. Google's XMPP extension is called Jingle
and, like SIP, it acts as a Session Description Protocol carrier.
SIP itself defines a method of passing instant messages between endpoints, similar
to SMS messages. This is not generally supported by commercial operators.
Commercial applications
Firewalls typically block media packet types such as UDP, though one way around
this is to use TCP tunnelling and relays for media in order to provide NAT and firewall
traversal. One solution involves tunnelling the media packets within TCP or HTTP
packets to a relay. This solution uses additional functionality in conjunction with SIP,
and packages the media packets into a TCP stream which is then sent to the relay.
The relay then extracts the packets and sends them on to the other endpoint. If the
other endpoint is behind a symmetrical NAT, or corporate firewall that does not allow
VOIP traffic, the relay would transfer the packets to another tunnel. One
disadvantage of this approach is that TCP was not designed for real time traffic such
as voice, so an optimized form of the protocol is sometimes used.
As envisioned by its originators, SIP's peer-to-peer nature does not enable
network-provided services. For example, the network can not easily support legal
interception of calls (referred to in the United States by the law governing
wiretaps, CALEA). Emergency calls (calls to E911 in the USA) are difficult to
route. It is difficult to identify the proper Public Service Answering Point, PSAP
because of the inherent mobility of IP end points and the lack of any network location
capability. However, as commercial SIP services begin to take off practical solutions
to these problems are being proven. Standards being developed by such
organizations as 3GPP and 3GPP2 define applications of the basic SIP model which
facilitate commercialization and enable support for network-centric capabilities such
as CALEA.
Many VoIP phone companies allow customers to bring their own SIP devices, as
SIP-capable telephone sets, or softphones. The new market for consumer SIP
devices continues to expand.
The free software community started to provide more and more of the SIP
technology required to build both end points as well as proxy and registrar
servers leading to a commoditization of the technology, which accelerates global
adoption. SIP foundry has made available and actively develops a variety of SIP
stacks, client applications and SDKs, in addition to entire IP PBX solutions
that compete in the market against mostly proprietary IP PBX implementations
from established vendors.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Advanced Networking
Technologies Division provides a public domain implementation of the JAVA
Standard for SIP JAIN-SIP which serves as a reference implementation for the
standard. The stack can work in proxy server or user agent scenarios and has
been used in numerous commercial and research projects. It supports RFC 3261 in
full and a number of extension RFCs including RFC 3265 (Subscribe / Notify) and
RFC 3262 (Provisional Reliable Responses) etc
Attributes and Credits
The information and facts supplied on this subject
derive from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
| ____________________________________________________________________ |
| ____________________________________________________________________ |
| Copyright © voipsolutionjournal.com - 2007 All Rights Reserved - VOIP Solution Journal VoIP Solution Journal Selecting a VoIP Solution Phone System for Home and Business. |
| Home | Contact Us | About Us | Site Map | Privacy Policy | More Voip Solution Articles |
________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
|
| Selecting a VoIP Solution Phone System for Home and Business. |
| VOIP Solution Journal |
| | VoIP Phone | Voip PBX | Business Small VoIP | Vonage VoIP | VoIP Service Provider | | VoIP Phone System | Business Service VoIP | WiFi VoIP | |
The VoIp Solution Workbook is a comprehensive guide to terms and definitions that
are commonly used in reference to understanding VoIP Solutions.
are commonly used in reference to understanding VoIP Solutions.
| Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) |